We just completed a CSM course in Toronto.
Here are the impediments they identified, although some are phrased in a positive way (but implying the lack of the positive).
This list, as with others here, supports the idea of a public impediment list. Of course, the real issue is 'fixing impediments regularly and aggressively." But we find that that starts with a good prioritized list of impediments. And we attack them one impediment at a time.
Here's their list (not in order):
- Small teams (<5 7.="" a="" amp="" and="" are="" better="" closer="" first="" for="" i="" is="" li="" notion="" person="" right="" scrum="" size="" small="" team="" teams="" that="" the="" them="" think="" this="" timelines="" to="" too="" will="" with="" work="">
- Making time to meet
- Changing requirements
- Task breakdown (poor)
- Being in the office at the same time (not)
- Compressed timeline
- Admitting we need agile or a Proj Mgmt solution
- Tight timelines
- Technical challenges
- Lack of people with diverse and required skills
- Waterfall/Agile hybrid
- Lack of people for given schedule
- Delays (outside the team that mean the team will 'fail')
- Lack of flexibility
- Poor communication
- Too much planning, not enough execution
- Old fashioned tech
- Lack of people
- Over budget
- Lack of proper planning
- Lack of approach
- Lack customer feedback
- Incorrect requirements delivered
- Lack feedback
- Lack of detail in scope or requirements
- Lack skills
- Too ambitious feature list
- High level design
- Lack of collaboration between teams
- Poor scheduling
- Too complex
- Inadequate testing
- Lack of leadership 5>
No comments:
Post a Comment